Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

In the News…

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

I’m following this story about James Lee holding hostages at the Discovery channel.  I also went and read his manifesto.  I have to say, he brings up some valid points for a domestic terrorist.  TLC does indeed promote/glamorize  excessive childbirth with their “reality” shows about couples having litters upon litters of children.  They assure us that these kids are being fed and given the love and attention they deserve, and I’m not going to argue with that because I don’t have any facts to present.

While I don’t agree that we should start mass sterilizations of our population, I can’t help but feel like that would really be the only way to control some people.  The point, however, is that couples should not have more than two children.  We should just have enough to replace ourselves, and maintain the current population.  (In reality, we would be lowering the population slowly, due to accidental deaths.)  Using words like “parasites” and “plague” might be a strong way of putting it, but Lee is correct in those thoughts.  Far more of us destroy this planet than help it.

In closing, though, I’m going to say that strapping a bomb to yourself (even if it turns out that it’s a fake bomb) and demanding that a network change its programming lineup is the absolute wrong way to go about this.  You’re coming across as a crazy person, and won’t be taken seriously.  More importantly, you’re endangering lives.  While humanity may be destroying this planet, humanity is also a part of nature and has just as much a right to exist as the forests.  I hope no one gets hurt in this.

Dear World – An Open Letter

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Dear World,

I am writing to ask that you stop being so stupid. Your constant, idiotic shenanigans are causing me to lose my faith in humanity. Every day, I see the mindless masses reacting in the most illogical way to situations which are being sensationalized by the media, and the problem is getting worse. Allow me to use the current situation of this “swine flu pandemic” as an example.

As of 8:00am Eastern this morning, There were 64 confirmed cases of Swine Flu in the United States, and one death. The death was a 22-month old Mexican toddler that had been flown in for treatment, and I offer my most sincere condolences to the family. Now, I am certain that there are more than 64 cases, which have not yet been confirmed, but the reaction to these numbers is far overblown.

There are over 300 MILLION people in the United States. Even if there are as many as 10,000 infected citizens (and that’s not a number based on any statistic from the CDC or World Health Organization. I just made it up as a number grossly over-exaggerated than the factually stated count), that is less than one out of every 30,000 people. Now, for people who get sick, the rate of death can’t be calculated. Logic and Science dictates that the people at highest risk will be the elderly and the young.

According to news reports, “over a hundred” people are dead in Mexico City from this flu. Mexico City reported a population of over 8 Million people last year. Since the media gave us such an abstract number, but didn’t say over TWO hundred, let’s assume the number of deaths is 199. That’s a mortality rate of .002% of the population. (One out of every 5,000 people? My brain is starting to hurt from all this math.) But now stories are leaking out about how Mexico City isn’t responding to this flu correctly. (And, as an American, I can only report on the stereotypes of Mexican health care, not anything factual, so I will leave that aspect of this criticism untouched.)

I’m not saying the swine flu isn’t a threat. I’m just saying you’re more likely to be killed in a car accident than by it. (Odds of that, according to a 2003 survey, is one in 6,500. Over a 78 year lifespan, that’s about one in 83.) The swine flu numbers aren’t really important, however. You can look at the same sort of media coverage over the Bird Flu or a Mad Cow Disease outbreak or anything that can cause fear in the general populace. My point is that the media is sensationalizing the news.

Why would they do that? Because they have to. Today’s viewers don’t want a stodgy old man with a stone face delivering the facts. They want to feel involved. They want to be entertained. They need the magic box to keep their living room interesting, not bore them out of their minds. (If I were an avid conspiracy-theorist, I could even go so far as to say that the media is causing this fear on purpose, because a frightened population is easier to control, less likely to object to soldiers walking their streets in the name of safety. But I’ll leave that sort of speculation to the conspiracy theorists.)

But this letter isn’t addressed to the media. It’s addressed to the world. So, World, I am asking you to calm down and think. When the media starts talking about hundred of deaths, put it in perspective. It’s hundreds of people that you probably didn’t know, that probably didn’t know each other, and that were scattered across a very broad population. When they start talking about how deadly this new threat is, take a deep breath and realize that they aren’t telling you that the majority of these deaths are across elderly people, very young people, and people who didn’t bother going to the hospital over what they thought was just an annoying fever.

If you’ve read this, and agree with what I’m saying, then I ask that you do one last thing. I ask that you turn off your television tonight. The news will still be there in the morning. Eat dinner at the table with your family and talk to each other. If you don’t have family, go out to eat with your friends and talk with them. Stop worrying, and start living. You’ll find that it’s a lot more enjoyable.

Sincerely,
Stuck

Michael Moore, Where Are You?

Wednesday, August 20th, 2008

It’s time to make a new documentary.  The topic for this one can be the one-sided reporting on this entire Russia-Georgia conflict.

The United States media is making Russia out to be the aggressor in this little conflict, and not mentioning South Ossetia at all.  In fact, on a FOX News report, when interviewing some Americans who were over there when all of this started, they broke away from the interview TWICE when the people tried to explain what caused all of this.

America, I strongly encourage everyone to read their news from more than one angle.  Check out The Guardian, for starters.

One other point to consider is this:  When the South tried to break away from the United States, the United States went to war.  Has the U. S. changed it’s policy on that?  Because I know this state is full of rednecks who’d like to try again.  ;)

I hate the Olympics and I hate the media…

Tuesday, August 12th, 2008

Have you heard how awesome Michael Phelps is?  Apparently he is a better swimmer than Aquaman.  Like, the fastest thing in water since… ever.  So fast, in fact, that he won the 100 meter freestyle relay BY HIMSELF!

If you watched any news reports about the relay race yesterday, and there were several different reports, you might understand what I’m talking about.  On the last leg of the relay race, America was almost a full body-length behind France.  In a heroic display of effort, Michael Phelps swam like a fish to overtake the Frenchman and win the event.

Wait…  that’s not how it happened at all.  Michael Phelps had already swum his lap, and America was behind.  It was Jason Lezak who put on the water-jets and snatched victory from his ass.  A 32-year old man came from behind and beat the French world-record holder for the 100m freestyle.  But did the media talk about that?  Hell no.  They couldn’t shut up about how Michael Phelps was on-track for winning eight gold medals.  In fact, the most aired video clip wasn’t the final seconds of the race, where Lezak wins by a fingernail.  It was of Michael Phelps screaming like some wild barbarian.

What the fuck is wrong with this country when we celebrate the arrogant dream of someone more than we celebrate the actual victory that his teammate brought home?

I hope Phelps doesn’t get his eight gold medals.  I hope he doesn’t get five.  The Olympics aren’t supposed to be about one person.  They’re supposed to be about the world.

In other news, Russia invaded the hell of of Georgia.  Obama is planning a trip to Atlanta to survey the damage.  ;)

Christmas Fashion

Friday, December 15th, 2006

He sees you when you’re sleeping…
He knows when you’re awake…
He knows if you’ve been bad or good…
-Creepiest Christmas Song Ever

There was an article in The State earlier this week that condemned the wearing of Christmas sweaters, citing that only a child should be allowed to get away with something so garish. Quite frankly, the story has me torn.

On the one hand, I can not imagine my aunt not wearing a Christmas sweater. Ever. Like even in mid-July. We go to her house every year for Christmas Day, and I guess my brain has just made that mental association. I see her other times in the year without a seasonal sweat, but that’s not how I remember her.

On the other hand, I think this fashion statement has exploded out of control. They’ve gone from simple designs to absolutely tacky depictions of Santa and reindeer that people should be ashamed to wear them. (And this is coming from a guy who owns a tee shirt that has the word ‘FUCK’ on the back in ten-inch letters.)

But this post isn’t about sweaters, specifically. It’s about how every aspect of Christmas has boldly charged into the realm of tacky bullshit. Houses so bright with colored lights that planes mistake them for airfields, inflatable snow globes with Homer Simpson inside, wearing a Santa suit, reindeer built from wires and white lights that move (which creeps me out to no end, but it might just be me…), and that God-forsaken bell-ringer in front of every large store, just ringing away for whatever spare change we have.

Christmas is no longer a religious holiday. It’s all about the insanity now. (I’m sure I have a friend or two who would argue that religion and insanity are the same thing.) It’s about stores competing to see which can put out more holiday ads, office managers seeing how many Christmas trees they can fit around the office, neighbors seeing who can put more inflatable shit in their front yard…
These two house are across the street from me. (I apologize for the picture quality, it was dark and I was overcome by an urge to smash their shit. In the daytime it’s even worse because they are mostly lifeless, deflated husks…) A few years ago, it started out with just two inflatable in one yard and one in the other. The year after that, they began to escalate. And now, with planes landing directly over my house every night, I am afraid for my safety. I expect that, any night now, I’m going to wake up and think that the moon is crashing into my house again… Only it really will crash into my house this time.

So this is my plea to you, insane citizens of the world. Please exercise some restraint in future holiday seasons. While I am certain that the inflatable snow globe looks like a good idea when you’re standing in the middle of Lowe’s, I assure you that it’s not. Practice moderation. If your power bill goes up by more than five dollars because of your decorations, then you’ve gone too far. I’m not asking for anyone to go as minimalist as myself when it comes to decorating, but I think it’s a good idea to aim for that.

This is my holiday decoration…From the outside, it looks like I’m a perfectly reasonable fellow who put a tree up. From the inside, I’ve gone the practical route and decided to fool my neighbors into thinking I’m a nice guy.

If, insane citizens of the world, you can not control these holiday urges, I believe we, the practical minimalists, will have to strike back. I have made contact with several manufacturers in China and Thailand who are awaiting the word from me which will begin production of millions of Labor Day inflatable, sweaters, and lights. Don’t make me do it…

Tonight on FOX : When Policemen Attack…

Friday, November 17th, 2006

Some say the end is near
Some say we’ll see Armagaeddon soon
I certainly hope we will
I sure could use a vacation from this
bullshit three-ring circus sideshow of
freaks here in this hopeless fucking hole we call L.A.
-From Tool’s “Aenima”

Aubrey Jenkins posted a link in her blog that gave me some material to talk about today. Check out this story by the Los Angeles Times. Here is the video. Now you’ve read the story and you’ve seen the video. Here’s what I think about it:

So a UCLA student goes to the library after 11:00pm and is asked for his student ID. Because he looks to be of an Arabic/Middle-Eastern descent, he refuses on the grounds that he feels like he is being profiled. He refuses several times, in fact. The Campus Police are called and he still refuses, and decides that he would rather just leave. The police decide that he’s exercised enough of his freedoms at this point, and might be hiding something, so they stop him by taking hold of his arm. He tells them to get their hands off of him. (It’s the quote that’s right at the beginning of the video, partially cut off.) There’s no visual clip of this part, but I’m betting he yanks his arm free. (You can’t really yell like that and not yank your arm away. It doesn’t drive the point home. Now if you look at the hand on your arm and calmly, coldly, say “get you hand off of me” that might be effective too. Anyway…) Things escalate and he gets the first taste of the taser. From there, it becomes a cycle of him getting zapped and yelling that he’s too weak to stand…

Now, did the police go too far? Of course they did. It’s Los Angeles. These cops are infamous for going to far. One taser shot is sufficient to disable a man enough to get cuffs on him. All of these cops know it, too, since they have to BE tasered to carry one.

Did the student instigate this? Yes. I’ve NEVER been to a campus library when I wasn’t asked for an ID, and this was back in 1994, well before 9/11. Back when terrorism was a myth that our parents told us about to make the 80s seem less cool than they really were. To refuse, on several occasions, to show ID is grandstanding. This guy wanted to make a scene. He succeeded, and now he’s going to make a bajllion dollars in a lawsuit that the taxpayers of California are going to have to pay for.

The moral of the story, boys and girls, is that when a police officer asks/tells you to do something, you fucking do it. You don’t piss and moan about your rights. You don’t hesitate. You don’t refuse. You comply, and you comply quickly. If the officer is asking you to do something that is wrong, or a violation of your perceived rights, then you take it up with the police force at a later date, through proper channels.

Thursday’s Child has far to go…

Friday, October 20th, 2006

A local news station, WLTX, released a story today which needs comment. I know I’m cynical. I know that I expect the worst of people. But this story absolutely blew my mind:

An 11-year-old girl boarded her North Side Middle School bus with a steak knife in her bag, and murderous intent in her heart. She intended to follow through on a threat she had made to a 13-year-old classmate. If I’m forced to see the bright side of this story, I can only say that it’s good to see a child willing to keep their word and see a project to its completion.

Now, I like to think I had some hard times in my childhood. My mother could tell you several stories of my childhood (sometimes two or three times if she’s been hitting the wine… Love you, Mom!) that paint me as a diminutive criminal, and I can’t really argue with her about it. But never, not once, did I ever consider murder as a solution to any of my childhood problems.

Because of this, I can not relate to this child’s thought process at all.
I can only hope that she is mentally ill, and this is due to some chemical imbalance beyond her control. I don’t believe that, however, and expect that this child knew exactly what she was doing, as well as the permanency of death.

What could possibly be the explanation for this behavior? What will happen from here? Who will be the first to refuse to accept responsibility for this? Stay tuned, readers…

Wednesday’s Child is Full of Woe…

Friday, October 20th, 2006

The State newspaper ran a story today about the growing trend of American families adopting children from other countries instead of American children. According to their numbers, the number has tripled in the past ten years. The subtitle of the story is “Practice leaves some wondering whether U.S. kids in foster system are forgotten.” To those “some” who are “wondering,” let me clear up your confusion.

These children are not forgotten. They are protected to the point of absurdity. Our domestic adoption agencies will investigate every miniscule detail of the prospective parents, and base their decision on what they believe is the child’s best interest. Please don’t misunderstand me, though, I think these (or any, for that matter) children should be protected. There are plenty of sick fucks out there. I just don’t agree that anyone can really determine how good a parent will be until they’ve been given a chance.

Also, in America, we give too many rights to the birth-mother, who can change her mind at any time during the adoption process. Even worse, there are several documented cases where the birth-mother sued for custody after the adoption was final. This is something that will only happy in our litigious (read “sue-happy”) society. Adopting a child from China, which is the most common supplier of foreign adoptions to the U.S., avoids all of the worry over this situation. In my opinion, once a woman has decided to give up her child, she should be held to that decision at all costs.

Rather than wondering if our own orphaned children are being forgotten, maybe we should be wondering if our respect for personal rights might be a little too lenient. Personal rights, I remind you, which are not expressly guaranteed by our beloved Constitution. But that is a completely different rant, isn’t it?

The Opposite of Common Sense

Tuesday, September 5th, 2006

When you use the phrase “common sense,” what exactly do you mean? Prudence? Practicality? Sound judgment? I got out my old Webster’s college dictionary from Random House and looked it up:

common sense, n. sound practical judgment that is independent of specialized knowledge or training; normal native intelligence

Sound practical judgment. Normal native intelligence. I don’t think the two mean the same thing.

Twenty years ago, I think it was different. I think your average person on the street had enough sense to come in out of the rain back then. Today, though, I have very little faith in the judgment of my fellow man. Maybe my view of the world was narrower when I was younger. Maybe the media has shifted since those days to focus more on the negative than the positive. Or maybe we, as a society, have lost our sound judgment. It reminds me of something I read in college.

Kurt Vonnegut wrote a short story titled “Harrison Bergeron.” It was about a society that forced equality on its citizens by making the athletic wear weights, the beautiful wear masks, and the intelligent wear small receivers that would blast a random sound into their ear to break their concentration. It’s this last one that I’m reminded of. The wife in the story is of average intelligence, and does not have to wear one of these radios.

I remember reading this story and thinking how incredibly dumb this woman was. How could she possibly represent a person of average intelligence? But, of course, I hadn’t met everyone on the planet. Hell, I was living on campus at Clemson University. (Not to say we were all geniuses or anything, but certainly above average intelligence.) So maybe that’s it. Maybe my perspective of society is skewed because I’ve surrounded myself with people who have above average intelligence, and it caused me to believe the average was higher than it really is.

What’s my point? The world is full of idiots. A lot fuller than it should be. Watch the news and you’re bound to see a story of some guy doing something incredibly stupid and getting in heaps of trouble for it. (I could make a few political comments here, but I won’t.) Even the internet is a playground for these people. Don’t believe me? Just read any public message board for a few days. They come out of the woodwork (or at least circuit boards, in this case) just to argue about the pointless.

Ask any reasonably intelligent person what their definition of “Common Sense” is, and they’ll likely give you a definition very close to “sound practical judgment that is independent of specialized knowledge or training.” They’re also likely to agree that it does not mean the same thing as “normal native intelligence.”

So I move that we either change the definition of the phrase, or invent a new phrase for our misplaced definition. Perhaps we should call it Uncommon Sense.

Bible-Thumping Gone Terribly, Terribly Wrong

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

It’s time for another quasi-political commentary from Stuckey. CNN had a story today that made bile well up in my throat. As usual, rather than swallow this bile, I decide to spit it out onto my keyboard. The story is about a group of bikers, known as the Patriot Guard Riders, who drive all over to show respect at the funerals of our soldiers who have fallen in Iraq. This isn’t the part that upsets me. The part that upsets me is the REASON they do this. They attend these funerals to drown out the flock of a man named Reverend Fred Phelps. Phelps leads a group of morons to these protests because he claims that God is killing our soldiers because we are fighting on behalf of a country that shelters homosexuals.

Let’s make sure I understand this. Iraq shelters homosexuals. God doesn’t like homosexuals. So God kills the men and women who defend Iraq. What version of the Bible did this fuckwit read? Wouldn’t he just blow Iraq up himself like he did with Sodom and Gomorrah?

The protesters attend these funerals and commence with shouting vulgarities at the mourners, holding signs that proclaim their infinite ignorance (Examples read “God is an American Terrorist” and “Thank God for dead soldiers”), and basically embarassing the Baptist community. (Visit this link to see examples of the protesters in all their redneck splendor.) The bikers attend to shield the bereaved families from having to see this crap. Tremendous points for these bike-riding angels. At the end of this game of life, I think they’re going to win.

I hate to make this rant, like the last one, focus on religious zealots who have no grip on reality. I believe in God. I try to abide by the Big Ten every day of my life. I try like Hell to love my neighbor. But when my neighbor is holding a sign that reads “Fags die God laughs,” it’s hard to turn the other cheek. It’s hard not to cast stones.

Fred Phelps, a disbarred lawyer and Baptist preacher, isn’t new to the media spotlight. Before Iraq, he sent his flock forth to protest at the funerals of AIDS victims. Most unfortunately for those families, no group had thought to organize a counter-protest to drown them out.

Phelps revels in the hate he’s generating. He’s on record saying, “If you’re preaching the truth of God, people are going to hate you. Nobody has the right to think he’s preaching the truth of God unless people hate him for it. All the prophets were treated that way.”

Well, Prophet Phelps, let me say that I don’t want whatever religion you’re selling. I love my God just fine. I look forward to shaking hands with those bikers when I meet them in Heaven.

A Rolling Stone Gathers No Moss When Thrown at an Embassy…

Tuesday, February 7th, 2006

There are two things my father advised me never to discuss if I wanted to keep my friends. The first was how much I hated the person they were dating. The second was religion. Since I felt so damn good after my last rant, I’m going to keep rolling.

Religion, in general, is a pretty unreasonable theory. Let’s face it, to claim that some supreme being made everything in existence is the opposite of reason. Scientists and athiests would call it an unreasonable attempt to explain the unknown. It’s the basis for faith, basically. Faith is accepting this unreasonable explanation as fact. So why is it such a surprise to me that people who accept this unreasonable explanation of Life, the Universe, and Everything would act so unreasonably?

I’m talking, of course, about the Islamic reaction to a political cartoon. Let us look at the facts, shall we? It was a cartoon published, originally, in one paper. It was, according to Islamic belief, blasphemous. I’m even going to go so far as to state, as a fact, that it was insensitive to Islam.

But to riot in the streets? To throw rocks at U.N. officials? To trample your own brethren when the police, to no one’s surprise, use force to disperse the masses? This goes beyond the simply unreasonable. This is absolute lunacy. (And the next full moon isn’t until Sunday.)

I’m not saying that they shouldn’t be angry. I’m saying they need to vent that anger to the correct place. You can not blame an entire nation for one paper’s cartoon. You can not attack people who have nothing to do with this blasphemy. In doing so, you are creating a presence of fear in the innocent. Heck, you’re creating an essence of outright terror. (You see where I’m going with this?) You are becoming terrorists.

Why, in Allah’s name, would you give people more reason attack you? HA! I just answered my own question. But perhaps you should go back and read your Holy Quran (59: 23-25) again. “He is Allah, and there is no God beside Him, the Knower of the unseen and the seen. He is Gracious, the Merciful.” Merciful? Doesn’t that mean forgiving? Doesn’t that mean, pretty much, the opposite of violent?

Allah was not a terrorist. To attack people in His name is to shame him, and shame yourselves. Just like the Crusades were an embarassment to Christianity, so too is this jihad.

Stop proving the narrow-minded correct. Be angry. But be civil.
(And now that I’ve said “terrorist” in a web-publication, I’m probably on some FBI watch list and a soon-to-be-kidnapped list.)

No More Mister Nice Guy, Part Two

Monday, February 6th, 2006

In honor of my deciding not to be a Nice Guy anymore, I’ve decided to offend as many people as I can with this entry.

When did we become so afraid of not keeping everyone happy? Remember when Super Bowl commercials were funny? Remember when they might possibly be misconstrued as offensive? Remember when we cared less what everyone would think and more about getting our point across? This rant is going to go all over the place, so hang on.

Today’s rant is about the thin-skinned pussies who can’t take a joke. It’s about the conservative minority that thinks it knows how everyone should act. It’s about the loudmouthed, overprotective, parents who think “time-out” is an effective alternative to a good old-fashioned spanking. It’s about all the people who have turned America’s youth into an uncontrollable bunch of savages while trying to prevent it.

I’m sick of everything being politically correct. It’s flat out retarded. For example, why did the term African-American come to exist? What the hell is wrong with the word “black?” I don’t take offense to being called white. I don’t insist on minorities referring to me as an Anglo-American. Last month, in a rare bout of news-watching, I saw an anchor refer to a black English (as in U.K.) person as an African-American. WTF? It raised a question in my mind. Do the British blacks insist of being called African-English? African-British? If you want to complain about people calling you black, I insist that you first complain about rap stars calling each other “nigger.” If they start saying African-American, then so will I.

I’m sick of people protesting the content in today’s entertainment. These people scream bloody murder over the idea of sex in a video game. I’ve got a news flash for you people. Your kids have already seen it all. By the fifth grade, most kids know how sex works and have probably started a stash of porn that they will hide in the tree-fort. Perhaps instead of spending all this energy fighting the manufacturers, you should spend it raising your damn kid.

We have raised generation of children who have been told that nothing is their fault. If they overeat, it’s because the fast food industry offered too good a deal on upsizing their lunch combo. If they take a gun to school, it’s because Hollywood made guns seem too glamorous. If they turn to drugs, it’s because they didn’t get enough attention at home. Wait, that might actually be true. In fact, it’s so true that I think that explanation can cover everything they do. If you want to shift blame from the children, then shift it to the parents.

I was spanked as a child, often. My father actually made a pattern that he used to carve out new wooden paddles because they went through them so fast. I will never say that my parents beat me, though. A spanking is a far cry from a beating. I never played with my father’s guns because I knew that he would tan my hide if I did. I ate a moderately healthy diet because my mother (God bless her) stayed home and cooked us dinner every night.

Maybe the problem is that mothers decided they didn’t want to stay home anymore. Or perhaps some woman’s group decided it for them, and they went along with it. Don’t mistake this as sexism, though. I think a woman can go out and make the money while the father stays home. My point isn’t that women need to stay home and raise their kids. My point is that SOMEONE needs to stay home with them, and that someone better not be afraid to spank them.

So how did Superbowl commercials lead me into this rant? Because last night was probably the worst batch of commercials I’ve seen on Superbowl Sunday yet. There are only four commercials that I remember. The bug-zapper doctor, the night-flight encounter, the backyard football game with the girls, and the colt pulling the Budweiser wagon. (And the last one wasn’t even funny. It was sappy junk, geared towards female drinkers.)

Whatever happened to the “Wassup?” guys at Budweiser? Oh yeah, someone said they were “targeting an African-American audience.” Of course, that led to a moderately funny series of spin-offs, such as the Italian “How ya doin’?” guys and the Ivy-league “What are you doing?” guys. The real question, though, is what is wrong with targeting a specific audience? You think Colt 45 malt liquor doesn’t have a target audience? You think those hideous rims on the Caddy Escalade didn’t have a target audience? (Yeah, be offended. I don’t care. Those rims were ghetto.) Rather than bitch about the commerical and how it offends you, how about you just not buy their product? Your wallet will speak more effectively than your mouth, and I get to see funny commercials again.

Did I miss anyone? Let me know, and I’ll try and piss them off next time.

People are Morons

Tuesday, January 10th, 2006

Just to break up the routine of El Monterrey, I went to The Mall Friday for lunch. I figured I’d grab a book, check out EBGames, maybe buy a new pair of tennis shoes, and grab a Chic-fil-a meal to go. Instead, I was overwhelmed by the throng of idiots and morons that are everything I associate with The Mall.

First of all, most of these kids need to be in school. If it’s not a school day, then they should be playing outside. Yeah, this may make me a grumpy old man, but since it was forced on me when I was their age, I feel it’s my civic duty to bitch about it. Kids comprise 60% of the people at The Mall that I have a problem with. The other 40% is made up of old people.

Someone needs to take these Mallrats, young and old, aside and offer them a class in maintaining awareness of their surroundings. Being a good civil servant, here is a basic outline of what that class should entail:

1) If you are walking slower than every single person you see, then do NOT walk six abreast and block everyone behind you who is on a time-constraint.

2) If you see a store that you want to go in, then move to that side of the mall well in advance so that you don’t cut off traffic suddenly as you veer from the opposite lane with all of your firneds.

3) Pretend the two sides fo the hallway are an interstate. Everyone going the same direction as yourself should be on the right hand side. If someone needs to turn to enter a store acrossd the way, they should pull into the middle and await a proper gap to slip through. If you have blinkers, use them. Hand singals will suffice if not.

4) Do NOT, under any circumstances, stop suddenly if you are walking at a good pace. Odds are that the time-constraint people are using you as a plow and are right behind you. If the storefront looks nice, go in, rather than stop to admire it. Stopping will result in you getting knocked on your ass. You have been warned.

Of course, Mallrat morons are the same people that get out there on the highways, which can easily explain the status of our driving population. I hear out-of-state drivers complain about us quite a bit. I’m not well-traveled, so I can’t say for certain that this problem is or is not local to South Carolina. So if it’s just a South Carolina problem, consider everything I say about drivers to be directed only at this state.

The average driver is a moron. On a daily basis, I witness about 40% of drivers refuse to use turn signals, 25% that come to a complete stop so they can make a right turn into a parking lot, and 30% that can’t stay in their lane. And then there are the people who just can’t park…

In these times of oversized pickups, Hummers, and SUVs, it seems that parking spaces simply aren’t large enough to accomodate certain vehicles. It seems that way, until you realize that just as many compact cars park just as retarded. Parking isn’t some new technology. Why, then, are some of us unable to perform it correctly?

And God forbid it drizzle! People slow down to ten under the speed limit because someone spit out a passing car’s window and it’s been mistaken for a downpour.

But my biggest driving pet peeve is the person who zooms past you only to get in front of you and set their cruise control slower than yours. There are times when I am glad I’m not a violent person, because I will visualize running these guys off the road and setting theit car on fire while their struggling with their seat belt. I did mention I’m not violent, right?

The Lazy Co-Worker

Thursday, September 8th, 2005

I’m sure you’ve all worked with this person once or twice in our lifetimes, and if you haven’t, then odds are pretty high that you’re the person I’m about to rant on. This is the man or woman who does nothing during the business day except make your own job harder.

While I’m usually a pretty tolerant person, today I have to blow off some steam or else I’m going to blow up at my current Lazy Co-Worker. Let me start by telling you a little bit about my job.

I work on a support desk. (Yes, it’s as thrilling as it sounds!) We man the phones and the incoming calls rotate through us. This rotation is simple. The person who has been idle the logest takes the next inbound call. Calls lead to work orders, and each employee has their own queue of work orders that need attention. Should a call come in while all four of us are unavailable to answer, it rolls over to the dispatch group and they put the work order in a group queue.

I’m the top closer on my team. (Oooooh. Who wants to touch me?) This isn’t really a huge deal, because I’m not very far ahead of the guy in second place, and the other two behind us are both relatively new employees. My queue stays pretty clean, with an average of only four work orders in it at the end of the day. The other “veteran” keeps his queue around eight. The two new employees are pretty consisitently over ten each. In their defense, the job of support is notrious for having poor training. You can teach someone how to use the program, but it’s much harder to teach them how to fix it when it doesn’t do what it’s supposed to.

So back to my original point, which is Mr. Lazy. Mr. Lazy was hired about eight months ago, and I was assigned to be his mentor. In the beginning, he was eager to learn. He was writing everything down on 3×5 index cards. He had a sense of humor, easy to get along with, and seemed to be the sort of teammate we needed.

Over time, I began to notice that he was asking the same questions. I’d help him, and he’d write up a notecard on it. Curious, I checked his notecard box while he was at lunch one day. The notes were correct, but he had about five or six notecards for each problem, each of which had the same procedure on them. He hadn’t been referring to his notecards at all before asking his questions. Why look it up when you can ask someone else to walk you through it?

So I drew up a quick index of the issues his library of cards covered, and made my own note (mental, of course) to ask him to refer to his index cards next time he came to me for assistance about one of those problems.

This worked for about an hour. Then he just stopped asking me for help and went to the other long-timer. At the end of that day, I let the other guy know the trick, and we agreed to back each other up in requiring a card search before offering assistance. The next day, when he was sent to his box of help, he made a visible effort to find the card for an issue I knew existed in there. He looked up after a minute and said he didn’t have that one. Now, having made an index, I knew it was in there, so I went over and looked in the box for him, found the card, and handed it to him. He gave me a look that still makes me laugh when I think about it. IT was the look of someone who knew they’d been caught in a lie.

Being a creative lazy person, Mr. Lazy moved on to new methods of loafing. Three bathroom breaks in the morning, for example, and then his “official” fifteen minute break. The morning is the busiest time for inbound calls, and each time he walks from his desk, he has to set his phone on Not Ready. This means when he returns to his desk, he becomes the last in line to receive a new call. We started monitoring this bathroom behavior, and the results were not surprising.

When the first three calls come in and are answered, making him next to receive a call, he would go to the bathroom. During the lunch shift, he modifies this slightly, because there’s only one other person on the phone (me). So when I answer a call during the lunch break, he goes to the bathroom.

Once we were wise to this new scheme, we began waiting for him to return from his little strolls and then we other three would click our Not Ready buttons and immediately turn them back off. This way, he still gets the next call and we’re all still ready if more than one come in.

Yet another fun part of working with Mr. Lazy is that a lot of our work orders require obtaining faxes from our customers. I keep these faxes neatly organized in two folders. One folder is for work orders currently open. The other is for work orders closed within the past two weeks. (In case someone calls back about the same issue.) His filing system is quite different. I call it the “Where the Fuck Did I Put That?” filing system.

Mr. Lazy’s desk is literally covered with faxes. There are no piles or stacks. It’s just a tablecloth of papers upon papers. He doesn’t throw any of them away, so there are faxes from four months ago mixed in with faxes from today, and the single pages of multi-page faxes are never grouped with their mates.

Now it’s common for customers to call and request the status of an existing work order. When they do this, we will look at that work order and see if it’s something we can help with. (After all, if you can close an extra call, it makes your numbers look better. And top closer gets a handy-dandy tote bag! Who wouldn’t want that?) When his customers call back, we no longer even try to look for the fax. We just ask them to fax it again.

So to all you hard workers out there, know that you are not alone. There are Mr. and Ms. Lazies everywhere you go

The Price of Gasoline

Friday, September 2nd, 2005

First, let me say that my heart goes out to the unfortunate victims of hurricane Katrina. I can not imagine the loss of family, friends, and home on that scale. A gasoline shortage is a small inconvenience when compared to their plight.

But this isn’t about a recent jump in gasoline prices. It’s about the trend that these companies have been setting for years. Allow me to explain:

Monday, the gas truck comes to Joe’s Gas Station and fills the resevoir. Joe pays the gas truck man and set his price at $2.00 a gallon based on that price.

Tuesday, there is a rumor of a gasoline shortage because some guy in some Arab nation said something mean. Joe marks his price up to $2.10 per gallon, even though the gasoline in his tanks has already been paid for.

Friday, it turns out that there was smaller shortage in gasoline than expected, so Joe marks his price down to $2.06 per gallon. When asked, he will say that the price is still inflated above the $2.00 he set on Monday because the price of gasoline went up.

The point is that gasoline is not a stock. Just because the price goes up on Wall Street doesn’t mean that gasoline you’ve already paid for goes up. I’m sure an economist will blather on about the law of supply and demand, but I’m going to retort with the law of Common Sense. Joe paid a flat rate for a tank full of gas. He should sell that entire tank of gas based on that price. If his next tank costs more, then I see no problem with him upping his price to cover that.

The worst thing about it is that there’s nothing to be done. These greedy bastards will continue to up their prices because we can’t live without gasoline. (At least not here in Columbia, where the mass transmit system is such a disgrace that low-income individuals would rather walk.) So I’m just going to sit here and bitch about it, because that what blogs are for, right?